Survival Isn’t a Love Language Notes from a Woman in Love

I don’t care what anyone says — you’ll never convince me that 90s “Black love stories” were actually about love. The Black romance we were shown back then was about dominance, ego, survival, and “hood loyalty,” not softness or mutual devotion.

A lot of the relationships we saw on screen taught Black girls that love equals endurance, competition, and emotional struggle. It was never “I love you and I choose you” — it was “I love me, but I rock with you”.

Movies and shows had us believing relationships like Love & Basketball, The Best Man, or Dwayne & Whitley from A Different World were #goals — when they were really examples of one-sided sacrifice disguised as romance.

Black romance on screen rarely showed mutual softness or stability… unless you were Sinclair & Overton from Living Single, happily silly and protected inside your own bubble.

From Blaxploitation films to 90s sitcoms, Black love was marketed as something you had to fight for, suffer through, or share, rather than something reciprocal and emotionally safe.

And the music? The “romantic” songs weren’t about slow-building love or partnership — they were about sex, intimacy, and temporary desire. Which taught Black women that being wanted meant being sexual, not being chosen.

When you look at it historically, media trained us to normalize struggle-love, side-chick culture, and emotionally unavailable men — and called that romance.

📚

📺 TV SHOWS (1990s Black Sitcoms & Dramas)

ShowCouple/CharactersDynamicA Different WorldDwayne & WhitleyEgo + chaos → romanticized perseveranceMartinMartin & GinaJokes instead of emotional vulnerabilityLiving SingleSinclair & OvertonRare soft, mutual, sweet loveMoeshaMoesha & QToxic independence + controlThe Jamie Foxx ShowJamie & FancyPursuit over partnershipThe Fresh PrinceWill & LisaImmediate chemistry, little emotional depthNew York UndercoverMultiple storylinesTrauma bonding & secrecy

TV themes:

• Comedic love instead of emotionally developed love

• Winning someone instead of choosing someone

• Women tolerating instead of receiving

📚 BOOKS (Black Authors 90s Era)

Terry McMillan Waiting to Exhale / Disappearing ActsEmotional drought + settling

Eric Jerome Dickey Friends & Lovers, Milk in My Coffee Casual sex > intimacy

Omar Tyree Flyy Girl Youthful sexual validation

Sister Souljah The Coldest Winter EverSurvival > romance

Books often showed romance as:

• Transactional

• Passionate but unsafe

• Lacking sustained emotional safety

🎶 MUSIC (90s R&B & Hip-Hop Romantic Themes)

Most of the “romantic” music wasn’t romance — it was sex, possession, or heartbreak:

Male R&B examples:

• Jodeci — “Freek’n You”

• H-Town — “Knockin’ Da Boots”

• R. Kelly — “Bump n Grind”

• Ginuwine — “Pony”

• Dru Hill — “In My Bed”

Female R&B examples:

• Mary J. Blige — heartbreak & survival

• Xscape — “Understanding” (emotional begging)

• SWV — “Weak” (yearning)

• TLC — independence mixed with distrust

Male Hip-Hop:

• Sex, conquest, ego, non-monogamy

Female Hip-Hop:

• Defense, dominance, no vulnerability

Bottom line:

90s music taught us:

• Sex = intimacy

• Wanting = love

• Pain = loyalty

• Independence = armor

🧠 WHY THIS MATTERS (My Point Validated)

You’re basically highlighting that:

✔ Black women were taught struggle-love > safe-love

✔ Softness was a privilege we didn’t get to see

✔ Romance was substituted withsurvival, sex, or spectacle

✔ Emotional availability was rarely modeled

✔ Pop culture normalized unbalanced relationships

I know I’m not wrong about the patterns I’ve seen in how Black love has been portrayed because I’ve lived it, watched it, and inherited it. I watched my mother, my aunts, and my grandmother all navigate the same archetypal relationship dynamics that media and culture have normalized as if they were the only option.

The story for many Black women has often been struggle, survival, or compromise as though emotional labor and endurance are prerequisites for love. Meanwhile, some Black men have been free to explore romantic relationships outside of our racial dynamics and, in those spaces, we’ve seen models of stability, softness, and mutual nurture that rarely show up in narratives centered around Black couples.

When I began dating outside of my race, I found myself living outside of my survival instincts the default behaviors I had learned to navigate the world. My partner once told me he thought I was constantly flirtatious, as if my warmth was something innately sexual. It took a moment of honest communication to explain that a smile, friendliness, and warmth were survival instincts tools for safety, connection, and human harmony not coquettishness.

He’s a white man, and I do not expect him to carry the lived experiences of a Black woman I never asked for that. But what I do expect, now that I understand my own worth, is a life that is soft, reciprocal, and nurturing without being labeled spoiled, desperate, or reduced to stereotypes. Love should not require sacrifice as its currency. Friendship should not require self-erasure. And the trauma bonds I once carried with friends who no longer share my path are evidence of patterns I no longer wish to repeat.

Real love is not survival; it’s presence. It’s mutuality. It’s peace.